Kenneth Vercammen, Esq is Chair of the ABA Elder Law Committee and presents seminars to attorneys and the public on Wills, Probate and other legal topics related to Estate Planning and Elder law. He is author of the ABA's book "Wills and Estate Administration. Kenneth Vercammen & Associates,
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817
(732) 572-0500 More information at www.njlaws.com/

Thursday, November 17, 2016

NJ Estate Tax NJSA 54:38-1 Imposition of tax; amount.

NJ Estate Tax NJSA 54:38-1  Imposition of tax; amount.
 54:38-1  a.  In addition to the inheritance, succession or legacy taxes imposed by this State under authority of chapters 33 to 36 of this title (R.S.54:33-1 et seq.), or hereafter imposed under authority of any subsequent enactment, there is hereby imposed an estate or transfer tax:

(1)Upon the transfer of the estate of every resident decedent dying before January 1, 2002 which is subject to an estate tax payable to the United States under the provisions of the federal revenue act of one thousand nine hundred and twenty-six and the amendments thereof and supplements thereto or any other federal revenue act in effect as of the date of death of the decedent, the amount of which tax shall be the sum by which the maximum credit allowable against any federal estate tax payable to the United States under any federal revenue act on account of taxes paid to any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, shall exceed the aggregate amount of all estate, inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid to any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, including inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid this State, in respect to any property owned by such decedent or subject to such taxes as a part of or in connection with the estate; and

(2) (a)Upon the transfer of the estate of every resident decedent dying after December 31, 2001, but before January 1, 2017, which would have been subject to an estate tax payable to the United States under the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. s.1 et seq.) in effect on December 31, 2001, the amount of which tax shall be, at the election of the person or corporation liable for the payment of the tax under this chapter, either

(i)the maximum credit that would have been allowable under the provisions of that federal Internal Revenue Code in effect on that date against the federal estate tax that would have been payable under the provisions of that federal Internal Revenue Code in effect on that date on account of taxes paid to any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or

(ii)determined pursuant to the simplified tax system as may be prescribed by the Director of the Division of Taxation in the Department of the Treasury to produce a liability similar to the liability determined pursuant to clause (i) of this paragraph reduced pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subsection.

(b)The amount of tax liability determined pursuant to subparagraph (a) of this paragraph shall be reduced by the aggregate amount of all estate, inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid to any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, including inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid this State, in respect to any property owned by such decedent or subject to such taxes as a part of or in connection with the estate; provided however, that the amount of the reduction shall not exceed the proportion of the tax otherwise due under this subsection that the amount of the estates's property subject to tax by other jurisdictions bears to the entire estate taxable under this chapter.

(3) (a) Upon the transfer of the estate of each resident decedent dying on or after January 1, 2017, whether or not subject to an estate tax payable to the United States under the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. s.1 et seq.), the amount of the taxable estate, determined pursuant to section 2051 of the federal Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. s.2051), shall be subject to tax pursuant to the following schedule:



On any amount up to $100,000 . ................................................0.0%
On any amount in excess of $100,000, up to $150,000  . . . . .0.8% of the excess over $100,000     
On any amount in excess of $150,000, up to $200,000. . . . . . .$400 plus 1.6% of the excess over $150,000
On any amount in excess of $200,000, up to $300,000. . . . . . . . . . .$1,200 plus 2.4% of the excess over $200,000
On any amount in excess of $300,000, up to $500,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,600 plus 3.2% of the excess over $300,000
On any amount in excess of $500,000, up to $700,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$10,000 plus 4.0% of the excess over $500,000
On any amount in excess of $700,000, up to $900,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,000 plus 4.8% of the excess over $700,000
On any amount in excess of $900,000, up to $1,100,000. . . . . . . . . .. $27,600 plus 5.6% of the excess over $900,000
On any amount in excess of $1,100,000, up to $1,600,000. . . . .$38,800 plus 6.4% of the excess over $1,100,000
On any amount in excess of $1,600,000, up to $2,100,000. . . . . $70,800 plus 7.2% of the excess over $1,600,000
On any amount in excess of $2,100,000, up to $2,600,000. . . . . $106,800 plus 8.0% of the excess over $2,100,000
On any amount in excess of $2,600,000, up to $3,100,000. . . . $146,800 plus 8.8% of the excess over $2,600,000
On any amount in excess of $3,100,000, up to $3,600,000. . . . . $190,800 plus 9.6% of the excess over $3,100,000
On any amount in excess of $3,600,000, up to $4,100,000. . . . . $238,800 plus 10.4% of the excess over $3,600,000
On any amount in excess of $4,100,000, up to $5,100,000. . . . . $290,800 plus 11.2% of the excess over $4,100,000
On any amount in excess of $5,100,000, up to $6,100,000 . . . . $402,800 plus 12.0% of the excess over $5,100,000
On any amount in excess of $6,100,000, up to $7,100,000 . . . . . $522,800 plus 12.8% of the excess over $6,100,000
On any amount in excess of $7,100,000, up to $8,100,000 . . . . . $650,800 plus 13.6% of the excess over $7,100,000
On any amount in excess of $8,100,000, up to $9,100,000 . . . . .  $786,800 plus 14.4% of the excess over $8,100,000
On any amount in excess of $9,100,000, up to $10,100,000 . . . . $930,800 plus 15.2% of the excess over $9,100,000
On any amount in excess of $10,100,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,082,800 plus 16.0% of the excess over $10,100,000


(b)A credit shall be allowed against the tax imposed pursuant to subparagraph (a) of this paragraph equal to the amount of tax which would be determined by subparagraph (a) of this paragraph if the amount of the taxable estate were equal to the exclusion amount.

For the transfer of the estate of each resident decedent dying on or after January 1, 2017, but before January 1, 2018, the exclusion amount is $2,000,000.

(c)The amount of tax liability of a resident decedent determined pursuant to subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph shall be reduced by the aggregate amount of all estate, inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid to any state of the United States, including inheritance taxes actually paid this State, in respect to any property owned by that decedent or subject to those taxes as a part of or in connection with the estate; provided however, that the amount of the reduction shall not exceed the proportion of the tax otherwise due under this subsection that the amount of the estate's property subject to tax by other jurisdictions bears to the entire estate taxable under this chapter.

(4)For the transfer of the estate of each resident decedent dying on or after January 1, 2018, there shall be no tax imposed.

b. (1) In the case of the estate of a decedent dying before January 1, 2002 where no inheritance, succession or legacy tax is due this State under the provisions of chapters 33 to 36 of this title or under authority of any subsequent enactment imposing taxes of a similar nature, but an estate tax is due the United States under the provisions of any federal revenue act in effect as of the date of death, wherein provision is made for a credit on account of taxes paid the several states or territories of the United States, or the District of Columbia, the tax imposed by this chapter shall be the maximum amount of such credit less the aggregate amount of such estate, inheritance, succession or legacy taxes actually paid to any state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia.

(2)In the case of the estate of a decedent dying after December 31, 2001, but before January 1, 2017, where no inheritance, succession or legacy tax is due this State under the provisions of chapters 33 to 36 of this title or under authority of any subsequent enactment imposing taxes of a similar nature, the tax imposed by this chapter shall be determined pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection a. of this section.

(3)In the case of the estate of a decedent dying on or after January 1, 2017 the tax imposed by this chapter shall be determined pursuant to paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection a. of this section.

c.For the purposes of this section, a "simplified tax system" to produce a liability similar to the liability determined pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (a) of paragraph (2) of subsection a. of this section is a tax system that is based upon the $675,000 unified estate and gift tax applicable exclusion amount in effect under the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. s.1 et seq.) in effect on December 31, 2001, and results in general in the determination of a similar amount of tax but which will enable the person or corporation liable for the payment of the tax to calculate an amount of tax notwithstanding the lack or paucity of information for compliance due to such factors as the absence of an estate valuation made for federal estate tax purposes, the absence of a measure of the impact of gifts made during the lifetime of the decedent in the absence of federal gift tax information, and any other information compliance problems as the director determines are the result of the phased repeal of the federal estate tax.

amended 2002, c.31, s.1; 2016, c.57, s.7.
 
54:38-2.  Additional tax in certain cases    If subsequent to the determination of the tax due under this chapter an additional or increased estate tax shall become payable to the United States by  reason of any redetermination, or additional or corrected assessment, as to a  portion of which the estate is entitled to a credit on account of estate,  inheritance, succession or legacy taxes paid to any state or territory of the  United States or the District of Columbia, then an additional estate tax shall  be due and payable to this state to be assessed in the same manner as provided  by section  54:38-1  of this title.

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Metuchen Library Wills, Estate Planning & Probate Seminar

Wills, Estate Planning & Probate Seminar
November 14 at 7:00pm Free community program
480 Middlesex Ave. Metuchen, NJ 08840
   Seniors invited
WILLS & ESTATE ADMINISTRATION-PROTECT YOUR
FAMILY AND MAKE PLANNING EASY
      You do not have to be a Metuchen resident to attend but registration requested

SPEAKER: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. Edison, NJ (Author- Wills and Estate Administration by the ABA)

       The NJ Probate Law made a number of substantial changes in Probate and the administration of estates and trusts in New Jersey. This seminar will also help attorneys better serve their clients.
       Main Topics:
1. The New Probate Law and preparation of Wills              
2.  Increase in Federal Estate and Gift Tax exemption
3. Major changes to NJ Estate Tax & changes to taxes on pensions
4. Power of Attorney                       
5.  Living Will                                           
6.  Administering the Estate & Probate

 COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, "Answers to
Questions about Probate" and Administration of an Estate, Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.

 (732) 632-8526
http://www.metuchenlibrary.org


Tuesday, November 08, 2016

Some retirement funds subject to NJ Estate Tax Estate of Smith v. Director, N.J. Div. of Taxation

Some retirement funds subject to NJ Estate Tax
Estate of Smith v. Director, N.J. Div. of Taxation

No. 015163-2013
Sept. 28, 2016 (Date Decided)
Judge Brennan
FOR PLAINTIFF: Matthew E. Moloshok (Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal, LLP, attorneys; David N. Narciso, on the briefs).
FOR DEFENDANT: Heather Anderson (Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Plaintiff, Estate of Phillip J. Smith, Deceased, Judith Heimer, Executor, challenged defendant, Director, Division of Taxation's imposition of inheritance tax on New Jersey's Alternate Benefit Program ("ABP") retirement benefits.
Phillip J. Smith died a widower on Oct. 5, 2010. His sister-in-law is the executrix of his estate and its primary beneficiary. At the time of his death, Smith's assets included $576,759.00 in ABP retirement benefits. Estate filed a New Jersey transfer inheritance tax return, in which it listed the ABP funds as a tax-exempt state pension. On audit, the Director determined that ABP proceeds are subject to New Jersey inheritance tax pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:34-1(c). The Director issued an assessment of $92,282.00 in additional inheritance tax.
Estate argued that all state-sponsored and state-administered pension plan entitlements are not subject to inheritance tax and therefore the decedent's ABP funds are tax exempt.
The Director argued that all profit sharing and retirement plans, both public and private, are subject to inheritance tax unless the Legislature has provided an exemption. Although ABP was enacted in 1967 and amended in 1969, it was not included in the June 26, 1969, amendments to the statutory tax exemption clauses for the defined benefit retirement programs, TPAF, PERS, PFRS and SPRS.
Estate advanced that when the state's pension laws are read in pari materia, they reflect the legislative intent that all state-sponsored pension plans are not subject to inheritance tax. The court disagreed. The Legislature provided limited exemptions from the inheritance tax to the defined benefit retirement programs.
Estate argued that imposing inheritance tax on ABP benefits, and not on the defined benefit retirement programs, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as the "unalienable rights" provision of the New Jersey Constitution. However, the rational basis for not enacting tax exemptions for the ABP is found in the vesting differences between the two retirement systems. It is the ABP participant's ability and flexibility to move between public and private employment in higher education, both within and beyond the state, that distinguishes it from state's defined benefit programs.
New Jersey's ABP retirement proceeds are subject to New Jersey Inheritance Tax. The Legislature intended to provide tax exemptions only to the state's defined benefit retirement programs, PERS, TPAF, PFRS, SPRS and JRS, as is reflected by the specific exemption language in those statutes.
source http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202769837808/Estate-of-Smith-v-Director-NJ-Div-of-Taxation?slreturn=20161008205152