Free Office Space for Attorney- Edison, NJ
Law Office also has space sharing opportunity for new lawyer to get experience and go to court.
Attorney will be provided with their own office to start their practice, rent free. In return they will handle municipal court appearances, Will signings and other legal work and criminal law website updates in lieu of rent for maximum 5 hours per week.
Go to court and get trial experience. Excellent opportunity to jump start your career. You will get to represent people in Municipal Courts in Middlesex, Union and Monmouth County and meet the top Prosecutors and Judges. Must be admitted in NJ and have a car.
Learn to interview potential Municipal Court/Criminal clients. Also learn to draft Wills and work on Litigation files. Attorney may also help provide legal assistance to members of prepaid legal plans and public defender clients. Follow up contact calls with clients, courts, prosecutors and bar associations.
Excellent mentoring position for the right attorney. Are you hardworking and aggressive? Visit our website: www.njlaws.com to learn about our office.
The following is included with office use:
1. Desk space on our 2nd floor
2. Use of 2nd floor conference table for meetings or depositions by appointment
3. Use of our audio tape and video library.
4. Use of the front room reception area
5. Ability to put a file cabinet in basement to store your old file
6. Lighting/ Utilities
7. Bathroom Supplies
8. Landscaping / Snow Removal
9. Cleaning of Common Area
10. Hot water, municipal water/sewer charge paid
Call KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
Sunday, October 05, 2008
WILLS, PROBATE AND ELDER LAW- Adult and Community Education
WHEN: Tuesday October 21, 2008 7 - 9 P.M.
East Brunswick Adult & Community Education Program
East Brunswick HIGH SCHOOL, Cranbury Rd
Course # FBB ...............................................................Fee: $29
Instructor: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison
(Co-Author- NJ Elder Law & Probate)
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, “Probate and Administration of an Estate”, Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
You don’t have to be wealthy or near death to do some thinking about a will. Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will discuss how to distribute your property as you wish and avoid many rigid provisions of the state law. Topics covered by author of “Answer to questions about Probate” will include: Wills, revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, power of attorney, living will, long term care insurance, reverse mortgage, plus the opportunity to ask questions.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com. You can also subscribe to the free email Elder Law newsletter by visiting the website, or sending an email to Kenv@njlaws.com.
Tues. 7:00–8:30 pm .......................................1 session: 10/21
Call the Adult Education Office for registration information 732- 613-6989
http://www.ebnet.org/Community_Programs/downloads/Fall_2008_Web.pdf
Please make checks payable to Adult and Community Education and mail to: Director, East Brunswick Adult and Community Education, EBHS, 380 Cranbury Road, East Brunswick, NJ 08816-3095.
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law, personal injury, and criminal / municipal court matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey’s most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com.
East Brunswick Wills rev 9/30/08Macbook
WHEN: Tuesday October 21, 2008 7 - 9 P.M.
East Brunswick Adult & Community Education Program
East Brunswick HIGH SCHOOL, Cranbury Rd
Course # FBB ...............................................................Fee: $29
Instructor: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison
(Co-Author- NJ Elder Law & Probate)
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, “Probate and Administration of an Estate”, Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
You don’t have to be wealthy or near death to do some thinking about a will. Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will discuss how to distribute your property as you wish and avoid many rigid provisions of the state law. Topics covered by author of “Answer to questions about Probate” will include: Wills, revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, power of attorney, living will, long term care insurance, reverse mortgage, plus the opportunity to ask questions.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com. You can also subscribe to the free email Elder Law newsletter by visiting the website, or sending an email to Kenv@njlaws.com.
Tues. 7:00–8:30 pm .......................................1 session: 10/21
Call the Adult Education Office for registration information 732- 613-6989
http://www.ebnet.org/Community_Programs/downloads/Fall_2008_Web.pdf
Please make checks payable to Adult and Community Education and mail to: Director, East Brunswick Adult and Community Education, EBHS, 380 Cranbury Road, East Brunswick, NJ 08816-3095.
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law, personal injury, and criminal / municipal court matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey’s most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com.
East Brunswick Wills rev 9/30/08Macbook
Sunday, August 17, 2008
In the Matter of the Estate of Madeleine Stockdale, Deceased (A-121-06)
Argued October 9, 2007 -- Decided July 22, 2008HOENS, J., writing for a unanimous Court.
In this appeal, the Court considers the circumstances in which it is appropriate to award punitive damages against a party in a Probate Part proceeding who has engaged in undue influence in the creation of a will or testamentary trust, or in securing an inter vivos transfer of property in lieu thereof.
Madeleine Stockdale, the testatrix, owned a large home on Monroe Avenue in Spring Lake. Following her husband's death and despite her considerable wealth, she lived frugally and her house eventually fell into disrepair. She talked of selling her home to someone who would restore the home to its former grandeur and agree not to subdivide it. Stockdale was distant from others and distrustful, believing that they were only interested in her for her money. She had no children and no family except for two nephews, George and Peter Lawrence, with whom she had little contact. Stockdale was reclusive, associating with only a few people whom she considered to be her "acquaintances." The Pattersons and the DiFeos were among Stockdale's acquaintances and, in general, they looked after her. Stockdale was impressed with the good work of the volunteers of the Spring Lake First Aid Squad (SLFAS). She intended to leave her entire estate to charity out of respect for the selfless acts of kindness and because it would keep her assets away from the control of the government and limit estate taxes.
In September 1997, Stockdale listed her home for sale for the price of $1.4 million. A neighbor, Ronald Sollitto, was interested in the Stockdale home. He introduced himself directly to Stockdale and shortly thereafter, he and his wife began to help Stockdale around her home and to bring her food, continuing to express how much they liked her home.
In March 1998, Stockdale executed the first of the two wills ("1998 Will") that were eventually offered for probate and that are at the center of this appeal. At that time, Stockdale was in her late 80's or early 90's, was living alone in the Monroe Avenue house, and was in declining health. The 1998 Will was prepared by William Soons, the attorney who handled Stockdale's legal affairs. The 1998 Will named Soons and Peter Kuzmick co-executors of her estate. Stockdale directed that her home be sold on her death and that the proceeds be included in her residuary estate. The 1998 Will also included a substantial number of specific bequests and named SLFAS as the residuary beneficiary.
On the same day that the 1998 Will was executed, Stockdale entered into a new listing agreement for the sale of her home at a price of $1.65 million. In March 1999, Sollitto made an offer on the home that Stockdale rejected; nonetheless, the two continued to discuss Sollitto's purchase of the home. Sollitto claims he promised that he would not subdivide the property; would restore the home to its original grandeur; and would allow Stockdale to remain in the home until she was ready to leave. Although none of these promises was reduced to writing, Stockdale was induced to sign a proposed contract to sell the property to Sollitto for $1.3 million. That contract was prepared by Thomas Foley, an attorney retained by Sollitto. The contract made no mention of the various promises Sollitto had made to Stockdale and included a variety of terms that were unfavorable to her. Stockdale retained Soons to review the contract and to represent her in the sale of her home. Soons contacted Foley in respect of his concerns about the unfavorable terms in the contact. Rather than continuing the negotiations with Soons, Foley prepared an addendum to the contract and gave it to Sollitto, who brought it directly to Stockdale for her signature. Soons was led to believe that the deal was off, even though the parties continued to move forward with the agreement.
In December 1999, Stockdale fell and broke her hip, causing a further deterioration in her already declining health. She was eventually transferred to a rehabilitation facility where Sollitto visited and continued to discuss the pending house sale. Sollitto sent Michael A. Casale, a very close personal friend, to advise Stockdale on the sale. On December 21, 1999, Casale visited Stockdale at the rehab facility but did not reveal his very close personal relationship with Sollitto. According to Casale, Stockdale told him that she wanted to sell her home to Sollitto because he would not demolish it. Casale stated that she asked about a power of attorney and declared her desire to change her 1998 Will. Casale met with Stockdale again on December 27, 1999 where, according to Casale, Stockdale agreed to accept $50,000 from Sollitto at closing, with the remainder of the purchase price to be paid through a note and purchase money mortgage at 5% interest, which was two to three points below the current market rate. Casale testified that Stockdale had crossed out the clause in the 1998 Will leaving her residual estate to the SLFAS because she no longer wanted to leave them her money. On or about December 29, 1999, Casale met with Stockdale for a third time at which time Casale claims Stockdale decided to make Sollitto her residual beneficiary and replace her existing co-executors with Casale as the sole executor of the estate. In addition, she agreed to put a provision in her new will to forgive any mortgage debt that might be owed. Casale and Sollitto spoke regularly after Casale's meetings with Stockdale.
Because of Stockdale's imminent throat surgery, Casale executed the new will and closing documents on January 3, 2000 without the assistance or presence of Sollitto's attorney. The employees of the rehab facility who witnessed the signing of the new will ("2000 Will") were unable to testify whether Stockdale had the requisite testamentary capacity, although the facility's director did testify that Stockdale likely did not have the requisite capacity based on her ingestion of pain medication and her increased signs of confusion. On that day, Stockdale also signed a deed ("2000 Deed") transferring to Sollitto title to her house.
Once discharged from the rehab facility, Sollitto eventually moved Stockdale to an apartment that he rented in her name, secluded from her acquaintances. He and his family had moved into the Stockdale's home. In early February, Sollitto wrote a check to pay for utility charges on the Monroe Avenue home using his Power of Attorney to access Stockdale's funds. The record also shows that Sollitto removed Stockdale's antique furniture and pictures from her home. At the time of her death in April 2000, the Monroe Avenue home was worth significantly more than the purchase price. Moreover, Stockdale's estate taxes under the 2000 Will were considerably more than what would have been owed under the 1998 Will.
On March 1, 2000, Casale offered the 2000 Will for probate; on April 28, 2000, Soons, unaware of the existence of the 2000 Will, offered the 1998 Will for probate. Shortly thereafter, SLFAS, the residuary beneficiary under the 1998 Will, lodged a caveat against the 2000 Will. Casale filed a complaint in the Probate Part, seeking to dismiss the caveat and admit the 2000 Will to probate. SLFAS answered the complaint and filed a third-party complaint against Sollitto and Casale, claiming that the 2000 Will was procured by undue influence and fraud, and that the inter vivos transfer of the title to Stockdale's home by deed was similarly flawed. SLFAS sought both compensatory and punitive damages, together with attorneys' fees. Stockdale's previously disinherited nephews were allowed to intervene in the matter to protect any potential interests in the estate.
Following extensive discovery and a lengthy trial, the probate judge found that Sollitto and Casale were not credible and that Stockdale's 2000 Will was unenforceable as a product of undue influence. The probate judge also found that the 2 000 Deed and the 1999 real estate contract ("1999 Contract of Sale") transferring Stockdale's property to Sollitto were invalid as a product of undue influence and "sharp dealing." The judge set aside the 2000 Deed, voided the 1999 Contract for Sale, sustained the caveat, rejected the 2000 Will, and directed that the 1998 Will be admitted to probate. Relying on this Court's decision in In re Niles, the judge awarded SLFAS attorneys' fees as a form of punitive damages, finding that undue influence is a form of intentional tort that provides the basis for awarding punitive damages. Sollitto and Casale were required to pay attorneys' fees to SLFAS in the amount of $1,174,264.87.
The Appellate Division affirmed all but the award of attorneys' fees, remanding for consideration of punitive damages, noting that the trial court was mistaken in its view that an award of attorneys' fees under Niles is or may be a substitute for punitive damages.
The Supreme Court granted certification.
HELD: Actions arising from disputed wills and related documents designed to dispose of estate assets and which rest on allegations of undue influence are most often resolved through the equitable remedies available in the Probate Part. Although a finding that a party in an estate has engaged in undue influence may also, consistent with common-law notions of making an injured party whole and deterring particularly egregious behavior, support an award of punitive damages, the circumstances in which a punitive damage award is permitted is limited. Because the Appellate Division based its analysis on the assumption that punitive damage remedy is broadly available, its judgment is affirmed with modifications.
1. In a probate matter, the burden of proving undue influence ordinarily is on the will contestant. However, when there is a confidential relationship coupled with suspicious circumstances, undue influence is presumed and the burden of proof shifts to the will proponent to overcome the presumption. If there is a conflict of interest on the part of an attorney coupled with confidential relationships between testator and the beneficiary as well as the attorney, the presumption must be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence rather than a preponderance of the evidence. An attorney-client relationship is inherently a confidential relationship and because suspicious circumstances need only be slight, the existence of that relationship often results in both the shifting of the burden and the imposition of a clear and convincing standard of proof. (Pp. 30-34)
2. In probate matters, a tort-based claim can only arise if someone has acted so as to deplete or reduce the estate of its assets. In probate proceeding, there is generally neither compensatory damage-type award nor, by extension, the underpinnings needed for imposition of a punitive award. (Pp. 33-37)
3. In Niles, the Court emphasized New Jersey's strong public policy against shifting counsel fees from one party to another. A narrow exception exists for circumstances in which the executor or trustee commits the tort of undue influence that would enable the estate to be made whole by an assessment of all reasonable counsel fees against the fiduciary that were incurred by the estate. There is also the possibility of a punitive damage award arising from the "pernicious tort of undue influence." However, the availability of that remedy is limited to those situations in which ordinary remedies for breach of fiduciary duty will not lie or will be inadequate. The remedy is limited to situations were one who is essentially a stranger to the testator gains access to her through undue influence and then carries out a scheme to place himself into a position to seize control of that testator's assets through inter vivos transfer or by bequest. Any punitive damage award arising in the Probate Part must be in compliance with the Punitive Damages Act. This remedy will be infrequent, limited to circumstances in which the actor is not entitled to take from the estate by inheritance or through commissions, and thus an accounting and a surcharge remedy will be inadequate to restore the estate to its proper balance. (Pp. 37-45)
4. Sollitto and Casale were strangers to Stockdale, thus the surcharge remedy would be insufficient. There are distinctions between this matter and Niles. Because the claim in this case was brought by a putative beneficiary rather than by the substitute executor, no counsel fee could be awarded. The record includes ample facts and circumstances that would support a compensatory award and, potentially, a punitive one as well. Only the apparent confusion about the parameters of the available remedies prevented the Probate Part and the Appellate Division from engaging in the appropriate analysis of the record. It may well be that a punitive award is appropriate. It is left to the sound discretion of the Probate Part to consider the record in light of the Court's further guidance. (Pp. 45-51)
Judgment of the Appellate Division is AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and the matter is remanded to the Chancery Division, Probate Part, for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Argued October 9, 2007 -- Decided July 22, 2008HOENS, J., writing for a unanimous Court.
In this appeal, the Court considers the circumstances in which it is appropriate to award punitive damages against a party in a Probate Part proceeding who has engaged in undue influence in the creation of a will or testamentary trust, or in securing an inter vivos transfer of property in lieu thereof.
Madeleine Stockdale, the testatrix, owned a large home on Monroe Avenue in Spring Lake. Following her husband's death and despite her considerable wealth, she lived frugally and her house eventually fell into disrepair. She talked of selling her home to someone who would restore the home to its former grandeur and agree not to subdivide it. Stockdale was distant from others and distrustful, believing that they were only interested in her for her money. She had no children and no family except for two nephews, George and Peter Lawrence, with whom she had little contact. Stockdale was reclusive, associating with only a few people whom she considered to be her "acquaintances." The Pattersons and the DiFeos were among Stockdale's acquaintances and, in general, they looked after her. Stockdale was impressed with the good work of the volunteers of the Spring Lake First Aid Squad (SLFAS). She intended to leave her entire estate to charity out of respect for the selfless acts of kindness and because it would keep her assets away from the control of the government and limit estate taxes.
In September 1997, Stockdale listed her home for sale for the price of $1.4 million. A neighbor, Ronald Sollitto, was interested in the Stockdale home. He introduced himself directly to Stockdale and shortly thereafter, he and his wife began to help Stockdale around her home and to bring her food, continuing to express how much they liked her home.
In March 1998, Stockdale executed the first of the two wills ("1998 Will") that were eventually offered for probate and that are at the center of this appeal. At that time, Stockdale was in her late 80's or early 90's, was living alone in the Monroe Avenue house, and was in declining health. The 1998 Will was prepared by William Soons, the attorney who handled Stockdale's legal affairs. The 1998 Will named Soons and Peter Kuzmick co-executors of her estate. Stockdale directed that her home be sold on her death and that the proceeds be included in her residuary estate. The 1998 Will also included a substantial number of specific bequests and named SLFAS as the residuary beneficiary.
On the same day that the 1998 Will was executed, Stockdale entered into a new listing agreement for the sale of her home at a price of $1.65 million. In March 1999, Sollitto made an offer on the home that Stockdale rejected; nonetheless, the two continued to discuss Sollitto's purchase of the home. Sollitto claims he promised that he would not subdivide the property; would restore the home to its original grandeur; and would allow Stockdale to remain in the home until she was ready to leave. Although none of these promises was reduced to writing, Stockdale was induced to sign a proposed contract to sell the property to Sollitto for $1.3 million. That contract was prepared by Thomas Foley, an attorney retained by Sollitto. The contract made no mention of the various promises Sollitto had made to Stockdale and included a variety of terms that were unfavorable to her. Stockdale retained Soons to review the contract and to represent her in the sale of her home. Soons contacted Foley in respect of his concerns about the unfavorable terms in the contact. Rather than continuing the negotiations with Soons, Foley prepared an addendum to the contract and gave it to Sollitto, who brought it directly to Stockdale for her signature. Soons was led to believe that the deal was off, even though the parties continued to move forward with the agreement.
In December 1999, Stockdale fell and broke her hip, causing a further deterioration in her already declining health. She was eventually transferred to a rehabilitation facility where Sollitto visited and continued to discuss the pending house sale. Sollitto sent Michael A. Casale, a very close personal friend, to advise Stockdale on the sale. On December 21, 1999, Casale visited Stockdale at the rehab facility but did not reveal his very close personal relationship with Sollitto. According to Casale, Stockdale told him that she wanted to sell her home to Sollitto because he would not demolish it. Casale stated that she asked about a power of attorney and declared her desire to change her 1998 Will. Casale met with Stockdale again on December 27, 1999 where, according to Casale, Stockdale agreed to accept $50,000 from Sollitto at closing, with the remainder of the purchase price to be paid through a note and purchase money mortgage at 5% interest, which was two to three points below the current market rate. Casale testified that Stockdale had crossed out the clause in the 1998 Will leaving her residual estate to the SLFAS because she no longer wanted to leave them her money. On or about December 29, 1999, Casale met with Stockdale for a third time at which time Casale claims Stockdale decided to make Sollitto her residual beneficiary and replace her existing co-executors with Casale as the sole executor of the estate. In addition, she agreed to put a provision in her new will to forgive any mortgage debt that might be owed. Casale and Sollitto spoke regularly after Casale's meetings with Stockdale.
Because of Stockdale's imminent throat surgery, Casale executed the new will and closing documents on January 3, 2000 without the assistance or presence of Sollitto's attorney. The employees of the rehab facility who witnessed the signing of the new will ("2000 Will") were unable to testify whether Stockdale had the requisite testamentary capacity, although the facility's director did testify that Stockdale likely did not have the requisite capacity based on her ingestion of pain medication and her increased signs of confusion. On that day, Stockdale also signed a deed ("2000 Deed") transferring to Sollitto title to her house.
Once discharged from the rehab facility, Sollitto eventually moved Stockdale to an apartment that he rented in her name, secluded from her acquaintances. He and his family had moved into the Stockdale's home. In early February, Sollitto wrote a check to pay for utility charges on the Monroe Avenue home using his Power of Attorney to access Stockdale's funds. The record also shows that Sollitto removed Stockdale's antique furniture and pictures from her home. At the time of her death in April 2000, the Monroe Avenue home was worth significantly more than the purchase price. Moreover, Stockdale's estate taxes under the 2000 Will were considerably more than what would have been owed under the 1998 Will.
On March 1, 2000, Casale offered the 2000 Will for probate; on April 28, 2000, Soons, unaware of the existence of the 2000 Will, offered the 1998 Will for probate. Shortly thereafter, SLFAS, the residuary beneficiary under the 1998 Will, lodged a caveat against the 2000 Will. Casale filed a complaint in the Probate Part, seeking to dismiss the caveat and admit the 2000 Will to probate. SLFAS answered the complaint and filed a third-party complaint against Sollitto and Casale, claiming that the 2000 Will was procured by undue influence and fraud, and that the inter vivos transfer of the title to Stockdale's home by deed was similarly flawed. SLFAS sought both compensatory and punitive damages, together with attorneys' fees. Stockdale's previously disinherited nephews were allowed to intervene in the matter to protect any potential interests in the estate.
Following extensive discovery and a lengthy trial, the probate judge found that Sollitto and Casale were not credible and that Stockdale's 2000 Will was unenforceable as a product of undue influence. The probate judge also found that the 2 000 Deed and the 1999 real estate contract ("1999 Contract of Sale") transferring Stockdale's property to Sollitto were invalid as a product of undue influence and "sharp dealing." The judge set aside the 2000 Deed, voided the 1999 Contract for Sale, sustained the caveat, rejected the 2000 Will, and directed that the 1998 Will be admitted to probate. Relying on this Court's decision in In re Niles, the judge awarded SLFAS attorneys' fees as a form of punitive damages, finding that undue influence is a form of intentional tort that provides the basis for awarding punitive damages. Sollitto and Casale were required to pay attorneys' fees to SLFAS in the amount of $1,174,264.87.
The Appellate Division affirmed all but the award of attorneys' fees, remanding for consideration of punitive damages, noting that the trial court was mistaken in its view that an award of attorneys' fees under Niles is or may be a substitute for punitive damages.
The Supreme Court granted certification.
HELD: Actions arising from disputed wills and related documents designed to dispose of estate assets and which rest on allegations of undue influence are most often resolved through the equitable remedies available in the Probate Part. Although a finding that a party in an estate has engaged in undue influence may also, consistent with common-law notions of making an injured party whole and deterring particularly egregious behavior, support an award of punitive damages, the circumstances in which a punitive damage award is permitted is limited. Because the Appellate Division based its analysis on the assumption that punitive damage remedy is broadly available, its judgment is affirmed with modifications.
1. In a probate matter, the burden of proving undue influence ordinarily is on the will contestant. However, when there is a confidential relationship coupled with suspicious circumstances, undue influence is presumed and the burden of proof shifts to the will proponent to overcome the presumption. If there is a conflict of interest on the part of an attorney coupled with confidential relationships between testator and the beneficiary as well as the attorney, the presumption must be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence rather than a preponderance of the evidence. An attorney-client relationship is inherently a confidential relationship and because suspicious circumstances need only be slight, the existence of that relationship often results in both the shifting of the burden and the imposition of a clear and convincing standard of proof. (Pp. 30-34)
2. In probate matters, a tort-based claim can only arise if someone has acted so as to deplete or reduce the estate of its assets. In probate proceeding, there is generally neither compensatory damage-type award nor, by extension, the underpinnings needed for imposition of a punitive award. (Pp. 33-37)
3. In Niles, the Court emphasized New Jersey's strong public policy against shifting counsel fees from one party to another. A narrow exception exists for circumstances in which the executor or trustee commits the tort of undue influence that would enable the estate to be made whole by an assessment of all reasonable counsel fees against the fiduciary that were incurred by the estate. There is also the possibility of a punitive damage award arising from the "pernicious tort of undue influence." However, the availability of that remedy is limited to those situations in which ordinary remedies for breach of fiduciary duty will not lie or will be inadequate. The remedy is limited to situations were one who is essentially a stranger to the testator gains access to her through undue influence and then carries out a scheme to place himself into a position to seize control of that testator's assets through inter vivos transfer or by bequest. Any punitive damage award arising in the Probate Part must be in compliance with the Punitive Damages Act. This remedy will be infrequent, limited to circumstances in which the actor is not entitled to take from the estate by inheritance or through commissions, and thus an accounting and a surcharge remedy will be inadequate to restore the estate to its proper balance. (Pp. 37-45)
4. Sollitto and Casale were strangers to Stockdale, thus the surcharge remedy would be insufficient. There are distinctions between this matter and Niles. Because the claim in this case was brought by a putative beneficiary rather than by the substitute executor, no counsel fee could be awarded. The record includes ample facts and circumstances that would support a compensatory award and, potentially, a punitive one as well. Only the apparent confusion about the parameters of the available remedies prevented the Probate Part and the Appellate Division from engaging in the appropriate analysis of the record. It may well be that a punitive award is appropriate. It is left to the sound discretion of the Probate Part to consider the record in light of the Court's further guidance. (Pp. 45-51)
Judgment of the Appellate Division is AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and the matter is remanded to the Chancery Division, Probate Part, for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Elder Law 2008- Expanding and Marketing an Elder Law Practice
Saturday, August 9, 2008 2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
American Bar Association Annual Meeting, New York City
Hilton New York
Speakers:
Jay Foonberg, Esq. - Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA
Charles Sabatino, director of the ABA's Commission on Law & Aging
Kenneth A. Vercammen, Esq. - co-author "Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law", Edison, NJ
Parag Patel, Esq. Iselin, NJ
Joan Burda, Ohio
Primary Sponsors: General Practice Section
Co-sponsors: ABA Commission on Law & Aging, Health Law Section,
YLD, Senior Lawyers Division, Real Probate & Trust Section, Tax Law Section
Topics:
Medicaid Law changes in 2006-2007- Protect yourself from inaccurate advice and malpractice
Getting referrals from other professionals
The aftermath of the Terry Schiavo case and Living Wills.
Forms you can use
Email newsletters
"Representing seniors- Doing well by doing good.-Do you know how?
- Foonberg's 10 page check list."
How to get more referrals and repeat business
How to manage telephone conversations with your clients
Marketing with written fee agreements
-Ethics and marketing without violating the Rules of Professional Conduct
Elder Law may be the biggest practice area of your career. There are 50,000 baby boomers/ day turning 60 and soon to be on Medicaid and will need legal advise. Elder Law is one of the biggest growth fields. Substantial changes in Medicaid law requires attorneys to learn ideas to avoid Medicaid/ nursing home liens.
[Contact Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. for program information 732-572-0500]
Contact American Bar Association's Experient at 800-421-0450 or at aba@experient-inc.com for registration & tickwets to events
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Saturday, August 9, 2008 2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
American Bar Association Annual Meeting, New York City
Hilton New York
Speakers:
Jay Foonberg, Esq. - Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA
Charles Sabatino, director of the ABA's Commission on Law & Aging
Kenneth A. Vercammen, Esq. - co-author "Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law", Edison, NJ
Parag Patel, Esq. Iselin, NJ
Joan Burda, Ohio
Primary Sponsors: General Practice Section
Co-sponsors: ABA Commission on Law & Aging, Health Law Section,
YLD, Senior Lawyers Division, Real Probate & Trust Section, Tax Law Section
Topics:
Medicaid Law changes in 2006-2007- Protect yourself from inaccurate advice and malpractice
Getting referrals from other professionals
The aftermath of the Terry Schiavo case and Living Wills.
Forms you can use
Email newsletters
"Representing seniors- Doing well by doing good.-Do you know how?
- Foonberg's 10 page check list."
How to get more referrals and repeat business
How to manage telephone conversations with your clients
Marketing with written fee agreements
-Ethics and marketing without violating the Rules of Professional Conduct
Elder Law may be the biggest practice area of your career. There are 50,000 baby boomers/ day turning 60 and soon to be on Medicaid and will need legal advise. Elder Law is one of the biggest growth fields. Substantial changes in Medicaid law requires attorneys to learn ideas to avoid Medicaid/ nursing home liens.
[Contact Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. for program information 732-572-0500]
Contact American Bar Association's Experient at 800-421-0450 or at aba@experient-inc.com for registration & tickwets to events
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
N.E. v. New Jersey Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, et al.
April 10, 2008 A-2276-06T2
The Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
correctly found that N.E. was not eligible for "Medicaid Only" benefits because, on the date as of which N.E.'s eligibility was determined, his resources exceeded the maximum amount permitted by N.J.A.C. 10:71-4.5(c), and pursuant to New Jersey's regulatory scheme, the income that N.E. was receiving and reasonably expected to receive had to be allocated to his spouse for her "Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance" before more of his resources could be allocated to the spouse.
April 10, 2008 A-2276-06T2
The Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services
correctly found that N.E. was not eligible for "Medicaid Only" benefits because, on the date as of which N.E.'s eligibility was determined, his resources exceeded the maximum amount permitted by N.J.A.C. 10:71-4.5(c), and pursuant to New Jersey's regulatory scheme, the income that N.E. was receiving and reasonably expected to receive had to be allocated to his spouse for her "Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance" before more of his resources could be allocated to the spouse.
In the Matter of the Trust Created by Agreement Dated December 20, 1961, by and between John Seward Johnson, Grantor, et al.
April 3, 2008 (A-70/71/72-06)
Notwithstanding the trial judge’s reliance on some testimony that should not have been admitted, there was substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole to support the trial judge’s conclusion that J. Seward Johnson wanted a broad class of possible beneficiaries, including surviving spouses. The trial court’s finding that the word “spouses” was intended to include widows and widowers is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division majority.
April 3, 2008 (A-70/71/72-06)
Notwithstanding the trial judge’s reliance on some testimony that should not have been admitted, there was substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole to support the trial judge’s conclusion that J. Seward Johnson wanted a broad class of possible beneficiaries, including surviving spouses. The trial court’s finding that the word “spouses” was intended to include widows and widowers is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division majority.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
ABA GP Solo ELDER LAW COMMITTEE Newsletter Spring, 2008
ABA General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Division
Chairs - Kenneth Vercammen, Edison, NJ and Jay Foonberg, Beverly Hills, CA
In this issue:
1. TYPES OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS
By Thomas D. Begley, Jr., Esquire
2 Elder Law 2008- Expanding and Marketing an Elder Law Practice Program at ABA Annual Meeting
3 New articles added in June, 2008 to Elder Law website:
1. TYPES OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS
By Thomas D. Begley, Jr., Esquire
There are essentially two types of special needs trusts: third party trusts and self-settled trusts. This article will discuss the features that are common to both trusts. In addition, there are pooled trusts. Pooled trusts can be either third party or self-settled. The distinction between a third party special needs trust and a self-settled special need trust is the source of funds. If the assets funding the trust are not the assets of the beneficiary but belong to a third party, then the trust is a third party trust. If the assets funding the trust are assets of the disabled beneficiary, then the trust is a self-settled trust.
Some trusts are pooled trusts in which the assets of many trusts are combined for investment purposes, but are managed individually for distribution purposes. There is a master trust document that is adopted to govern the trust. A pooled trust can be a self-settled trust or a third party trust, depending on whether the assets used to fund the trust belong to the person with disabilities or to a third party. Some pooled trusts provide that assets remaining in the pool upon the death of the person with disabilities is retained by the trust. Not all pooled trusts qualify under 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(C). Some trusts simply pool assets together for investment purposes, but do not qualify under OBRA ‘93.
Third Party Trust
The first type of special needs trust that disability law attorneys commonly draft is a third party special needs trust, which is established by the third party with assets of the third party for the benefit of a person with a disability. Typically, these trusts are established by a parent for the benefit of a child with a disability. In drafting third party special needs trusts, the attorney need not be concerned with Medicare claims, Medicaid liens, or age limits relating to the beneficiary. There is no requirement that the state Medicaid agency be paid back funds on the death of the beneficiary. If income from the trust is distributed to the beneficiary, it may reduce or eliminate public benefits. Therefore, income should be distributed to third parties to pay for goods and services delivered to the beneficiary. Similarly, the assets in the trust must not be available to the beneficiary. Therefore, the attorney has great flexibility in structuring the trust to achieve the income, gift and estate tax goals of the settlor.
There is no federal statutory authority for a third party special needs trust. However, the Social Security administration has policy regarding the effect of these trusts on benefits.[1]
Self-Settled Trust
The federal statutory authority for a self-settled special needs trust is found at 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(A)(payback trusts) and d(4)(C) (pooled trusts) and at HR 3443 Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 §205.[2] A self-settled special needs trust most frequently is a (d)(4)(A) trust and is referred to that way. It is established with the assets of the person with a disability. It must be established by the parent, grandparent, guardian of the person with a disability, or by a court. Only the person with a disability can be the beneficiary of the trust. These trusts are frequently used when an injured party receives money as a result of a tort action. The trust must be an inter vivos trust, rather than a testamentary trust, and it must be irrevocable. Prior to establishing the trust, the attorney must be concerned with the existence of any Medicare claim and Medicaid lien as well as claims for reimbursement from third party liability insurers. The trust cannot be established if the beneficiary is over age 65. On the death of the beneficiary, assets remaining in the trust must be used to pay back any state Medicaid agency providing benefits. There is considerably less flexibility with respect to achieving tax goals.
Special Needs Trust Comparison
Issue Third Party SNT Self-Settled SNT
Established By Third Party Parent, Grandparent, Guardian, or Court
Funded by Assets of Third Party Person with a Disability
Beneficiary Person with a Disability Person with a Disability and Nondisabled Person Only
Grantor Trust Can Be Yes
Grantor Trustee Can Be No
Discretionary Yes Yes
Inter Vivos Yes Yes
Testamentary Yes No
Revocable Can Be No
Gift Tax Annual Exclusion Can Use Cannot Use
Estate Tax Can Be Excluded Includable
Distributions Payments to Third Parties Payments to Third Parties
Disability SSA Definition SSA Definition
Pay Back Provision No Yes
Medicare Claim No Yes
Medicaid Lien No Yes
Age Limit None Under 65
Qualified Disability Trust Yes No
Copyright 2008 by Begley & Bookbinder, P.C., an Elder & Disability Law Firm with offices in Moorestown, Stone Harbor and Lawrenceville, New Jersey and Oxford Valley, Pennsylvania and can be contacted at 800-533-7227. The firm services southern and central New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania. Tom Begley Jr. is one of the speakers with Kenneth Vercammen at the NJ State Bar Association's Annual Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law and co-author with Kenneth Vercammen, martin Spigner and Kathleen Sheridan of the 400 plus page book on Elder Law.
The Firm provides services in connection with protecting assets from nursing home costs, Medicaid applications, Estate Planning and Estate Administration, Special Needs Planning and Guardianships. If you have a legal problem in one of these areas of law, contact Begley & Bookbinder at 800-533-7227.
2 Elder Law 2008- Expanding and Marketing an Elder Law Practice Program at ABA Annual Meeting
Saturday, August 9, 2008 2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
American Bar Association Annual Meeting, New York City
Hilton New York
Speakers:
Jay Foonberg, Esq. - Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA
Charles Sabatino, director of the ABA's Commission on Law & Aging
Kenneth A. Vercammen, Esq. - co-author "Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law", Edison, NJ
Parag Patel, Esq. Iselin, NJ
Joan Burda, Ohio
Primary Sponsors: General Practice Section
Requested co-sponsors: ABA Commission on Law & Aging, Health Law Section,
YLD, LPM, Senior Lawyers Division, Real Probate & Trust Section, Tax Law Section
Topics:
Medicaid Law changes in 2006-2007- Protect yourself from inaccurate advice and malpractice
Getting referrals from other professionals
The aftermath of the Terry Schiavo case and Living Wills.
Forms you can use
Email newsletters
"Representing seniors- Doing well by doing good.-Do you know how?
- Foonberg's 10 page check list."
How to get more referrals and repeat business
How to manage telephone conversations with your clients
Marketing with written fee agreements
-Ethics and marketing without violating the Rules of Professional Conduct
Elder Law may be the biggest practice area of your career. There are 50,000 baby boomers/ day turning 60 and soon to be on Medicaid and will need legal advise. Elder Law is one of the biggest growth fields. Substantial changes in Medicaid law requires attorneys to learn ideas to avoid Medicaid/ nursing home liens.
[Contact Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. for program information 732-572-0500]
Contact American Bar Association's ITS at 800-421-0459 for registration
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
3 New articles added in June, 2008 to Elder Law website:
Guardian Law Changes
Guardianship of Disabled Adults
If Undue Influence was 'Clear,' the Will of the Elderly Testatrix is Denied Admission to Probate.
If you have no Will
Letters of Administration if No Will
Letters of Instruction
Life Insurance Trusts
Action for Guardianship of a Mentally Incapacitated Person, Rule 4:86
Administration of Estates, Probate and Decedents
Answers to Probate Questions
Application to Surrogate's Court for Probate or Administration, Rule 4:80
Codicil to a Will
Compelling the Sale of Jointly Owned Houses-The Partition Suit
Elective Share of Spouse
Estate Planning/ Guardianship Interview Form
Estate/Will/Trust Inheritance Contests
Executor - Duties & Responsibilities
_______________________
-. WE PUBLISH YOUR FORMS AND ARTICLES
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few forms and articles PLUS tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please mail articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others in our Tort and Insurance Committee.
Let us know if you are finding any useful information or anything you can share with the other members. You will receive written credit as the source and thus you can advise your clients and friends you were published in an ABA publication. We will try to meet you needs.
Send Us Your Marketing Tips
We are increasing the frequency of our newsletter. Send us your short tips on your great or new successful marketing techniques.
You can become a published ABA author. Enjoy your many ABA benefits.
Send us your articles & ideas
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few articles and tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please send articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others.
General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Division:
Elder Law Committee and the ESTATE PLANNING, PROBATE & TRUST COMMITTEE
Who We Are
This committee focuses on improving estate planning skills, substantive law knowledge and office procedures for the attorney who practices estate planning, probate and trust law. This committee also serves as a network resource in educating attorneys regarding Elder Law situations.
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few articles and tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please send articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others.
Let us know if you are finding any useful information or anything you can share with the other members. You will receive written credit as the source and thus you can advise your clients and friends you were published in an ABA publication. We will try to meet you needs.
We also seek articles on Elder Law, Probate, Wills, Medicaid and Marketing. Please send your marketing ideas and articles to us. You can become a published ABA author.
________________________________________
The Elder Law Committee of the ABA General Practice Division is directed towards general practitioners and more experienced elder law attorneys. The committee consistently sponsors programs at the Annual Meeting, the focus of which is shifting to advanced topics for the more experienced elder lawyer.
This committee also focuses on improving estate planning skills, substantive law knowledge and office procedures for the attorney who practices estate planning, probate and trust law. This committee also serves as a network resource in educating attorneys regarding Elder Law situations.
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. co-Chair
Jay Foonberg, Beverly Hills Co-chair, Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA JayFoonberg@aol.com>
We will also provide tips on how to promote your law office, your practice and Personal Marketing Skills in general. It does not deal with government funded "legal services" for indigent, welfare cases.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
Kenv@njlaws.com
Central Jersey Elder Law www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com
NJ Elder Blog http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
ABA General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Division
Chairs - Kenneth Vercammen, Edison, NJ and Jay Foonberg, Beverly Hills, CA
In this issue:
1. TYPES OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS
By Thomas D. Begley, Jr., Esquire
2 Elder Law 2008- Expanding and Marketing an Elder Law Practice Program at ABA Annual Meeting
3 New articles added in June, 2008 to Elder Law website:
1. TYPES OF SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS
By Thomas D. Begley, Jr., Esquire
There are essentially two types of special needs trusts: third party trusts and self-settled trusts. This article will discuss the features that are common to both trusts. In addition, there are pooled trusts. Pooled trusts can be either third party or self-settled. The distinction between a third party special needs trust and a self-settled special need trust is the source of funds. If the assets funding the trust are not the assets of the beneficiary but belong to a third party, then the trust is a third party trust. If the assets funding the trust are assets of the disabled beneficiary, then the trust is a self-settled trust.
Some trusts are pooled trusts in which the assets of many trusts are combined for investment purposes, but are managed individually for distribution purposes. There is a master trust document that is adopted to govern the trust. A pooled trust can be a self-settled trust or a third party trust, depending on whether the assets used to fund the trust belong to the person with disabilities or to a third party. Some pooled trusts provide that assets remaining in the pool upon the death of the person with disabilities is retained by the trust. Not all pooled trusts qualify under 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(C). Some trusts simply pool assets together for investment purposes, but do not qualify under OBRA ‘93.
Third Party Trust
The first type of special needs trust that disability law attorneys commonly draft is a third party special needs trust, which is established by the third party with assets of the third party for the benefit of a person with a disability. Typically, these trusts are established by a parent for the benefit of a child with a disability. In drafting third party special needs trusts, the attorney need not be concerned with Medicare claims, Medicaid liens, or age limits relating to the beneficiary. There is no requirement that the state Medicaid agency be paid back funds on the death of the beneficiary. If income from the trust is distributed to the beneficiary, it may reduce or eliminate public benefits. Therefore, income should be distributed to third parties to pay for goods and services delivered to the beneficiary. Similarly, the assets in the trust must not be available to the beneficiary. Therefore, the attorney has great flexibility in structuring the trust to achieve the income, gift and estate tax goals of the settlor.
There is no federal statutory authority for a third party special needs trust. However, the Social Security administration has policy regarding the effect of these trusts on benefits.[1]
Self-Settled Trust
The federal statutory authority for a self-settled special needs trust is found at 42 U.S.C. §1396p(d)(4)(A)(payback trusts) and d(4)(C) (pooled trusts) and at HR 3443 Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 §205.[2] A self-settled special needs trust most frequently is a (d)(4)(A) trust and is referred to that way. It is established with the assets of the person with a disability. It must be established by the parent, grandparent, guardian of the person with a disability, or by a court. Only the person with a disability can be the beneficiary of the trust. These trusts are frequently used when an injured party receives money as a result of a tort action. The trust must be an inter vivos trust, rather than a testamentary trust, and it must be irrevocable. Prior to establishing the trust, the attorney must be concerned with the existence of any Medicare claim and Medicaid lien as well as claims for reimbursement from third party liability insurers. The trust cannot be established if the beneficiary is over age 65. On the death of the beneficiary, assets remaining in the trust must be used to pay back any state Medicaid agency providing benefits. There is considerably less flexibility with respect to achieving tax goals.
Special Needs Trust Comparison
Issue Third Party SNT Self-Settled SNT
Established By Third Party Parent, Grandparent, Guardian, or Court
Funded by Assets of Third Party Person with a Disability
Beneficiary Person with a Disability Person with a Disability and Nondisabled Person Only
Grantor Trust Can Be Yes
Grantor Trustee Can Be No
Discretionary Yes Yes
Inter Vivos Yes Yes
Testamentary Yes No
Revocable Can Be No
Gift Tax Annual Exclusion Can Use Cannot Use
Estate Tax Can Be Excluded Includable
Distributions Payments to Third Parties Payments to Third Parties
Disability SSA Definition SSA Definition
Pay Back Provision No Yes
Medicare Claim No Yes
Medicaid Lien No Yes
Age Limit None Under 65
Qualified Disability Trust Yes No
Copyright 2008 by Begley & Bookbinder, P.C., an Elder & Disability Law Firm with offices in Moorestown, Stone Harbor and Lawrenceville, New Jersey and Oxford Valley, Pennsylvania and can be contacted at 800-533-7227. The firm services southern and central New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania. Tom Begley Jr. is one of the speakers with Kenneth Vercammen at the NJ State Bar Association's Annual Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law and co-author with Kenneth Vercammen, martin Spigner and Kathleen Sheridan of the 400 plus page book on Elder Law.
The Firm provides services in connection with protecting assets from nursing home costs, Medicaid applications, Estate Planning and Estate Administration, Special Needs Planning and Guardianships. If you have a legal problem in one of these areas of law, contact Begley & Bookbinder at 800-533-7227.
2 Elder Law 2008- Expanding and Marketing an Elder Law Practice Program at ABA Annual Meeting
Saturday, August 9, 2008 2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
American Bar Association Annual Meeting, New York City
Hilton New York
Speakers:
Jay Foonberg, Esq. - Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA
Charles Sabatino, director of the ABA's Commission on Law & Aging
Kenneth A. Vercammen, Esq. - co-author "Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law", Edison, NJ
Parag Patel, Esq. Iselin, NJ
Joan Burda, Ohio
Primary Sponsors: General Practice Section
Requested co-sponsors: ABA Commission on Law & Aging, Health Law Section,
YLD, LPM, Senior Lawyers Division, Real Probate & Trust Section, Tax Law Section
Topics:
Medicaid Law changes in 2006-2007- Protect yourself from inaccurate advice and malpractice
Getting referrals from other professionals
The aftermath of the Terry Schiavo case and Living Wills.
Forms you can use
Email newsletters
"Representing seniors- Doing well by doing good.-Do you know how?
- Foonberg's 10 page check list."
How to get more referrals and repeat business
How to manage telephone conversations with your clients
Marketing with written fee agreements
-Ethics and marketing without violating the Rules of Professional Conduct
Elder Law may be the biggest practice area of your career. There are 50,000 baby boomers/ day turning 60 and soon to be on Medicaid and will need legal advise. Elder Law is one of the biggest growth fields. Substantial changes in Medicaid law requires attorneys to learn ideas to avoid Medicaid/ nursing home liens.
[Contact Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. for program information 732-572-0500]
Contact American Bar Association's ITS at 800-421-0459 for registration
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com
3 New articles added in June, 2008 to Elder Law website:
Guardian Law Changes
Guardianship of Disabled Adults
If Undue Influence was 'Clear,' the Will of the Elderly Testatrix is Denied Admission to Probate.
If you have no Will
Letters of Administration if No Will
Letters of Instruction
Life Insurance Trusts
Action for Guardianship of a Mentally Incapacitated Person, Rule 4:86
Administration of Estates, Probate and Decedents
Answers to Probate Questions
Application to Surrogate's Court for Probate or Administration, Rule 4:80
Codicil to a Will
Compelling the Sale of Jointly Owned Houses-The Partition Suit
Elective Share of Spouse
Estate Planning/ Guardianship Interview Form
Estate/Will/Trust Inheritance Contests
Executor - Duties & Responsibilities
_______________________
-. WE PUBLISH YOUR FORMS AND ARTICLES
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few forms and articles PLUS tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please mail articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others in our Tort and Insurance Committee.
Let us know if you are finding any useful information or anything you can share with the other members. You will receive written credit as the source and thus you can advise your clients and friends you were published in an ABA publication. We will try to meet you needs.
Send Us Your Marketing Tips
We are increasing the frequency of our newsletter. Send us your short tips on your great or new successful marketing techniques.
You can become a published ABA author. Enjoy your many ABA benefits.
Send us your articles & ideas
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few articles and tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please send articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others.
General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Division:
Elder Law Committee and the ESTATE PLANNING, PROBATE & TRUST COMMITTEE
Who We Are
This committee focuses on improving estate planning skills, substantive law knowledge and office procedures for the attorney who practices estate planning, probate and trust law. This committee also serves as a network resource in educating attorneys regarding Elder Law situations.
To help your practice, we feature in this newsletter edition a few articles and tips on marketing and improving service to clients. But your Editor and chairs can't do it all. Please send articles, suggestions or ideas you wish to share with others.
Let us know if you are finding any useful information or anything you can share with the other members. You will receive written credit as the source and thus you can advise your clients and friends you were published in an ABA publication. We will try to meet you needs.
We also seek articles on Elder Law, Probate, Wills, Medicaid and Marketing. Please send your marketing ideas and articles to us. You can become a published ABA author.
________________________________________
The Elder Law Committee of the ABA General Practice Division is directed towards general practitioners and more experienced elder law attorneys. The committee consistently sponsors programs at the Annual Meeting, the focus of which is shifting to advanced topics for the more experienced elder lawyer.
This committee also focuses on improving estate planning skills, substantive law knowledge and office procedures for the attorney who practices estate planning, probate and trust law. This committee also serves as a network resource in educating attorneys regarding Elder Law situations.
Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. co-Chair
Jay Foonberg, Beverly Hills Co-chair, Author of Best Sellers "How to
Start and Build a Law Practice" and "How to get and keep good clients', Beverly Hills, CA JayFoonberg@aol.com>
We will also provide tips on how to promote your law office, your practice and Personal Marketing Skills in general. It does not deal with government funded "legal services" for indigent, welfare cases.
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax) 732-572-0030
Kenv@njlaws.com
Central Jersey Elder Law www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com
NJ Elder Blog http://elder-law.blogspot.com/
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Saturday, March 01, 2008
WILLS, PROBATE AND ELDER LAW- Adult and Community Education
WHEN: Tuesday April 8, 2008 7 - 8:30 P.M.
You don’t have to be wealthy or near death to do some thinking about a will. Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will discuss how to distribute your property as you wish and avoid many rigid provisions of the state law. Topics covered by author of “Answer to questions about Probate” will include: Wills, revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, power of attorney, living will, long term care insurance, reverse mortgage, plus the opportunity to ask questions.
Instructor: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison
(Co-Author- NJ Elder Law & Probate)
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, "Probate and Administration of an Estate", Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com. You can also subscribe to the free email Elder Law newsletter by visiting the website, or sending an email to Kenv@njlaws.com.
East Brunswick Adult & Community Education Program
East Brunswick HIGH SCHOOL, Cranbury Rd
Course # SPS ....... Fee: $29
Tues. 7:00–9:00 pm ........ 1 session: 4/8
$ 29.00 registration fee required by adult school for all others. Call the Adult Education Office for registration information 732- 613-6989
http://www.ebnet.org/Community_Programs/downloads/Spring_2008_Web.pdf
Please make checks payable to Adult and Community Education and mail to:
Director, East Brunswick Adult and Community Education,
EBHS, 380 Cranbury Road, East Brunswick, NJ 08816-3095.
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law, personal injury, and criminal / municipal court matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey's most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com.
WHEN: Tuesday April 8, 2008 7 - 8:30 P.M.
You don’t have to be wealthy or near death to do some thinking about a will. Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will discuss how to distribute your property as you wish and avoid many rigid provisions of the state law. Topics covered by author of “Answer to questions about Probate” will include: Wills, revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts, power of attorney, living will, long term care insurance, reverse mortgage, plus the opportunity to ask questions.
Instructor: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison
(Co-Author- NJ Elder Law & Probate)
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, "Probate and Administration of an Estate", Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com. You can also subscribe to the free email Elder Law newsletter by visiting the website, or sending an email to Kenv@njlaws.com.
East Brunswick Adult & Community Education Program
East Brunswick HIGH SCHOOL, Cranbury Rd
Course # SPS ....... Fee: $29
Tues. 7:00–9:00 pm ........ 1 session: 4/8
$ 29.00 registration fee required by adult school for all others. Call the Adult Education Office for registration information 732- 613-6989
http://www.ebnet.org/Community_Programs/downloads/Spring_2008_Web.pdf
Please make checks payable to Adult and Community Education and mail to:
Director, East Brunswick Adult and Community Education,
EBHS, 380 Cranbury Road, East Brunswick, NJ 08816-3095.
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law, personal injury, and criminal / municipal court matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey's most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.centraljerseyelderlaw.com.
Elder Care Law 2008 Program
WHERE: Jack Cooper's Restaurant, Tano Mall, 1199 Amboy Ave., Edison, NJ
WHEN: February 20, 2008
8:30am Hot Buffet Breakfast
9:00am Meeting Starts
Cost: $15.00 Member of Insurance & Financial Advisors $25.00 Non-Member
Sponsor: Middlesex- Somerset Insurance and Financial Advisors
Information? Tom Schreiner, LUTCF, RFC, CSA, FIC
Email: thomas.schreiner@kofc.org or call 908-722-6336
President of Insurance and Financial Advisors of Middlesex, Somerset, and
Union Counties
SPEAKER: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison (Co-Author- NJ Wills & Probate)
Main Topics:
1. Wills and the changes to the NJ Probate Law
2. Power of Attorney with new HIPPA provisions
3. 2008 maximum $$$ per month Medicaid recipient
2008 maximum $$$ per month Medicaid spouse
2008 Lump Sum Medicaid recipient allowed to keep
2008 Lump Sum spouse allowed to keep
Five year look back starts when? 4. Question and Answer
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, "Probate and Administration of an Estate", Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.CentralJerseyElderLaw.com
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law and litigation matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey's most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.njlaws.com
WHERE: Jack Cooper's Restaurant, Tano Mall, 1199 Amboy Ave., Edison, NJ
WHEN: February 20, 2008
8:30am Hot Buffet Breakfast
9:00am Meeting Starts
Cost: $15.00 Member of Insurance & Financial Advisors $25.00 Non-Member
Sponsor: Middlesex- Somerset Insurance and Financial Advisors
Information? Tom Schreiner, LUTCF, RFC, CSA, FIC
Email: thomas.schreiner@kofc.org or call 908-722-6336
President of Insurance and Financial Advisors of Middlesex, Somerset, and
Union Counties
SPEAKER: Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. of Edison (Co-Author- NJ Wills & Probate)
Main Topics:
1. Wills and the changes to the NJ Probate Law
2. Power of Attorney with new HIPPA provisions
3. 2008 maximum $$$ per month Medicaid recipient
2008 maximum $$$ per month Medicaid spouse
2008 Lump Sum Medicaid recipient allowed to keep
2008 Lump Sum spouse allowed to keep
Five year look back starts when? 4. Question and Answer
COMPLIMENTARY MATERIAL: Brochures on Wills, "Probate and Administration of an Estate", Power of Attorney, Living Wills, Real Estate Sales for Seniors, and Trusts.
Here is your opportunity to listen to an experienced attorney who will answer questions how to distribute your property and avoid many rigid provisions of state law. For more information on Elder law, visit the Website www.CentralJerseyElderLaw.com
About the Speaker: Kenneth Vercammen is an Elder Law and Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ. He often lectures for the American Bar Association and New Jersey State Bar Association on Elder Law and litigation matters. He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on legal topics. He speaks as a volunteer on Wills and Elder law to Adult Community Schools and non profit groups including Edison, Metuchen, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, North Brunswick, South Brunswick, Piscataway, Sayreville, Old Bridge, Spotswood and Perth Amboy Seniors. He has established New Jersey's most popular Elder law website on the Internet to provide information on Probate, Elder Law and Traffic matters located at www.njlaws.com
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Suit for tortious interference with a Bequest must be filed in Probate Court
Felix M. Garruto, et al. v. Lorraine Cannici 12-21-07
A-2447-06T1
The Court held that an action for tortious interference with a bequest, premised upon undue influence by means of fraud, is barred when plaintiffs, with knowledge of probate proceedings, have failed to file a timely challenge to the will in probate court.
Felix M. Garruto, et al. v. Lorraine Cannici 12-21-07
A-2447-06T1
The Court held that an action for tortious interference with a bequest, premised upon undue influence by means of fraud, is barred when plaintiffs, with knowledge of probate proceedings, have failed to file a timely challenge to the will in probate court.
Quarg- Long time girlfriend's share should be set by contract law, not constructive trust
In the Matter of the Estate of Robert O. Quarg,
deceased 1-23-08
A-2459-06T3
Decedent's wife, from whom he had been estranged for over forty years, appealed the Chancery Division's order imposing a constructive trust on her surviving spouse's share of decedent's intestate estate in favor of decedent's companion, with whom he had lived since shortly after the estrangement. The court held that, decedent's conduct and actions, together with the lengthy time decedent and his companion lived together, and their mutual consideration as husband and wife, was sufficient to establish a question of fact whether there was an implied promise by decedent to ensure that his companion received adequate provisions during the remainder of her life. The court determined that the Chancery Division mistakenly relied upon an equitable principle of a constructive trust and the court remanded the matter for a determination whether such an implied contractual promise
could be established.
In the Matter of the Estate of Robert O. Quarg,
deceased 1-23-08
A-2459-06T3
Decedent's wife, from whom he had been estranged for over forty years, appealed the Chancery Division's order imposing a constructive trust on her surviving spouse's share of decedent's intestate estate in favor of decedent's companion, with whom he had lived since shortly after the estrangement. The court held that, decedent's conduct and actions, together with the lengthy time decedent and his companion lived together, and their mutual consideration as husband and wife, was sufficient to establish a question of fact whether there was an implied promise by decedent to ensure that his companion received adequate provisions during the remainder of her life. The court determined that the Chancery Division mistakenly relied upon an equitable principle of a constructive trust and the court remanded the matter for a determination whether such an implied contractual promise
could be established.
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
In the Matter of Anthony Crimaldi
12-06-07 A-3310-06T3
In determining whether a claimant may seek an accidental
disability retirement in the event of a "delayed manifestation
of the disability" more than five years after the traumatic
event, the Board of Trustees must consider the totality of
factors including when the delayed manifestation actually
occurred, why the filing was delayed, and prejudice to the
Public Employees Retirement System.
12-06-07 A-3310-06T3
In determining whether a claimant may seek an accidental
disability retirement in the event of a "delayed manifestation
of the disability" more than five years after the traumatic
event, the Board of Trustees must consider the totality of
factors including when the delayed manifestation actually
occurred, why the filing was delayed, and prejudice to the
Public Employees Retirement System.
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
B.D. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health
Services, et al.
A-1868-06T1 12-10-07
In this appeal, the court considered whether B.D., a
seventy-seven-year-old, wheelchair-bound woman already in need
of services, received fair market value when she transferred her
home, which had been appraised at $259,917, together with the
right to receive the rental income on an apartment within the
home that was then generating $1,180 per month, to her grandson
in exchange for his satisfaction of a $67,374.98 mortgage,
$10,191.70 in cash, and a lease of the other apartment within
the home to B.D. "for life." Concluding that the phrase "for
life," which was accompanied by unexplained references in the
lease to B.D.'s life expectancy, together with uncertainty as to
B.D.'s rights to the leasehold if she ceased occupying them,
rendered questionable B.D.'s claim that she received fair market
value and warranted a hearing into the meaning of the lease
terms.
Services, et al.
A-1868-06T1 12-10-07
In this appeal, the court considered whether B.D., a
seventy-seven-year-old, wheelchair-bound woman already in need
of services, received fair market value when she transferred her
home, which had been appraised at $259,917, together with the
right to receive the rental income on an apartment within the
home that was then generating $1,180 per month, to her grandson
in exchange for his satisfaction of a $67,374.98 mortgage,
$10,191.70 in cash, and a lease of the other apartment within
the home to B.D. "for life." Concluding that the phrase "for
life," which was accompanied by unexplained references in the
lease to B.D.'s life expectancy, together with uncertainty as to
B.D.'s rights to the leasehold if she ceased occupying them,
rendered questionable B.D.'s claim that she received fair market
value and warranted a hearing into the meaning of the lease
terms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)