M.E.F. v. A.B.F.
06-13-07 A-2501-05T1
In this case interpreting the spousal impoverishment
provisions of the Medicaid Catastrophic Care Act of 1988, we
discuss the circumstances in which a community spouse may obtain
a court order of support that supersedes the monthly income
allowance, determined through the administrative process, that
is deducted from the remaining assets of an institutionalized
spouse receiving Medicaid assistance in payment for his nursing
home care. We also discuss the level of proof required in the
state court proceedings.
Monday, July 09, 2007
Friday, July 06, 2007
Estate of Patricia Albanese v. John R. Lolio,
Jr., Esq.
06-04-07 A-1861-05T2
Summary judgment was granted to a law firm retained to
represent an estate which was sued for malpractice by the
executrix and other beneficiaries individually. The critical
issue related to whether the firm owed a duty of representation
to the plaintiffs as individuals based on the failure to advise
about personal tax liability relative to the sale of an asset of
the estate for estate tax purposes. The retainer should have
been clearer on the scope of representation, and summary
judgment was reversed as to the issue of duty to the executrix
as an individual, but not as to her sisters, the other
beneficiaries.
Jr., Esq.
06-04-07 A-1861-05T2
Summary judgment was granted to a law firm retained to
represent an estate which was sued for malpractice by the
executrix and other beneficiaries individually. The critical
issue related to whether the firm owed a duty of representation
to the plaintiffs as individuals based on the failure to advise
about personal tax liability relative to the sale of an asset of
the estate for estate tax purposes. The retainer should have
been clearer on the scope of representation, and summary
judgment was reversed as to the issue of duty to the executrix
as an individual, but not as to her sisters, the other
beneficiaries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)